Thursday, 25 July 2019

EL-ZAKZAKKY'S CONTINUED DETENTION: A DANGEROUS PRECEDENT- By Bimbo Shokunbi Esq

The hallmark of a democracy is Separation of Powers which in turn guarantees the Rule of Law. In a democracy, Rule of Law rules over Rule of Man.
The I999 Constitution of Nigeria has clearly spelt out  the roles of the three arms of government.
S. 47- 129 talks about LEGISLATURE. The Legislature creates and promulgates laws.
S.130 - 229 talks about the EXECUTIVE which administers policies based on the law.
S. 230 - 296 talks about the JUDICATURE / JUDICIARY which interprets the law and ensures compliance with dictates of the law.
The simple truth here is that the roles of every arm of government is unambiguously stated by the Constitution.The Rule of law is guaranteed if each arm of government plays according to the Rule.

Chapter IV of the Constitution guarantees  Fundamental Rights and these provisions are in tandem with provisions of  International Conventions .
S.34 of the Constitution says every individual is entitled to respect for the dignity of his person while S.35 says everyone shall be entitled to his personal liberty and that no one shall be deprived of such liberty .It spells out exceptions to this provision.

The Rule of Law makes democracy to thrive. Each arm must take into cognisance the fact that other arms have their roles to play and must  as a matter of fact  respect and not undermine them in any way. Their roles and powers are clear and separate( oversight functions notwithstanding).
The beauty of Separation of Powers  is that "too much" power is not concentrated in one arm. Consequently ,there are "checks and balance".

A court order while still subsisting is to be obeyed by all concerned no matter what anyone feels about it. El- Zakzakki was admitted to  bail over a year ago and the Federal Government has refused to release him on the ground of "National Security".
The simple question that needs to be answered here is , who determines what constitutes National Security? National Security must be  viewed against the backdrop of Rule of Law.

What the Federal Government has done is to undermine the Judiciary which is very dangerous for  democracy and Rule of Law.
If the Federal Government has any evidence at its disposal that makes El Zakzakky to be a security threat, such should have been presented to the court which would now determine whether it is in line with the law to detain him perpetually based on the reasons presented by the Federal Government. The Executive(Federal Government) can not be a Judge in its own case. The FG in this case is prosecuting him and at the same time came to the conclusion( usurped the role/function of the Judiciary) that he should not be released. This is clearly against the principles of Separation of Powers and Rule of Law.

To say the least, the action of the FG is akin to what we see in a dictatorship when all the powers vested in the three arms of government are concentrated in the dictator.

The  FG seems to have forgotten that the extra judicial killing of Boko Haram founder Yusuf contributed in no small measures to the Monster that Boko Haram is today. Has the FG considered the implication of his death or that of his wife in custody or can the FG that is still battling to curtail the activities of Boko Haram ,Herdsmen and other security challenges handle the aftermath of his death in custody? The FG with his continued detention is making a hero out of him as it now appears as if he is being persecuted.Why cant the FG release him and place him under watch?

The FG is setting a dangerous precedent by its continued disobedience of a subsisting order of the court.It simply means that subsequently, government and individuals can choose
 which order of the court is to be obeyed and which not to obey.
We can not continue to make Nigeria a laughing stock .We expect investors to see us as a serious people when we are telling the whole world that our Government and by extension Nigerians  do not obey court orders. No reasonable investor would take us serious.

The threat( to our democracy and implications of his death) in the continued detention of El Zakzakky is greater  than what the FG considers as National Security. I rest my case.

Bimbo Sokunbi.

Saturday, 20 July 2019

FATOYINBO Vs DAKOLOS: LET'S DISSECT BUSOLA DAKOLO'S VIDEO TESTIMONY

FATOYINBO Vs DAKOLOS: LET'S DISSECT THE VIDEO TESTIMONY
:
Since the plaintiff in this case, Busola Dakolo has brought this case to the public court, we have no choice but attend to this matter and keep searching for the truth, not just because those involved but as a lesson for others who are willing to learn. Insisting that I am neither for Dakolos or Fatoyinbo is expedient despite the CAN, Abuja chapter's hand of fellowship to Fatoyinbo and the undiplomatic letter from the Police Force to the Dakolos
I have studied the video and it has helped me to make independent decisions and I am willing to share this with the public:
1. The due diligence done on the interviewer shows he's a lawyer, presenter and entertainer. The most striking information about the 34yrs old Chude Jideonwo is he is a professional that uses the power of the media to stir people to action. He has worked with many reputable organisations and we must safely conclude he knew what he was doing. 
However, there are few things worthy of mentioning about the interview he conducted for Mrs Busola Dakolo:
a) He avoided referring to Pst Biodun Fatoyinbo as Pastor, throughout the interview. Though Busola kept referring to same as Pastor for the same duration. That suggests he has passed his judgment on the man and probably holds more resentment for him than the complainant.
b) Though Chude started the interview by feigning ignorance of the details of the accusations but at other points, he led his guest to make important and indicting revelations. Busola evidently rehearsed the interview and she did well. The bad thing was his helping her by concluding that such sexual scandal is an institutional problem with COZA.  I think that was too presumptuous and beyond the scope of the interview, haba? Institution means that is what COZA represents.
c).  It was an "exclusive interview" with Y! TV and I don't think a professional artistes of Busola status will do that without financial considerations.
d) Chude is a lawyer but he prefers coming to the public court before filing any complaint at the police station. That's not only unprofessional, it is suspicious because he is expected to know it is not enough to alleged someone of such crime, he must be able to prove beyond reasonable doubts that the accused is guilty as alleged.
NOW TO BUSOLA WORDS:
1. Busola refuses to tell us the actual date the crime was committed. She today us it was a Monday morning and about 7am, that's all. What about year and month? In this kind of wicked abuse, telling us your precise age then and date will do more than just telling us you were below 18yrs and in secondary school. No doubt, you met Pst Fatoyinbo as a secondary school student, that was well established in your video testimony but the age and date of crime was cleverly avoided, leaving most people to wrongly assume you were in secondary school when it happened.
2. The video testimony also confirmed that Busola first met Pst Fatoyinbo, then went back to school. She came back and became more active in Pst Fatoyinbo's ministry. There was no any reference to her return to secondary school after the two cases of rape as narrated by her. That suggested she has graduated from secondary school before the alleged rape. The question is: What year did she graduate or sat for WAEC? It is interesting to note that the only date available online pertaining to Busola online is that she wedded Timi Dakolo and that was after two children by Timi.
3. According to Busola's testimony, she's very strong willed and her siblings knew her for it and that was why she was the last to buy into the Pst Fatoyinbo's kind of ministry. With that acclaimed character, it contradicts why such person will hang around a disguised criminal for so long,  whether you tell others or not. This suggests that the rape might have taken place but it never led to resentment from you; you never saw him as dangerous and capable of greater harm. You reiterated many times that you were scared of his secret cult background but you never said he threatened your life. You only claimed he told you to do what he tells you and you will be fine. You made it clear you tried to avoid being alone with him but not scared of being around him. No resentment, no fright.
4. Busola was able to convince us from the video testimony that she saw Pst Fatoyinbo as father figure and that is a strong attachment because even in the video, the emotional attachment was convincing, no resentment.
5. Her mummy saw the way she and Pst Fatoyinbo were going and as a parent, I know the Mummy would have been concerned about her adolescent and unguided excitement about her Pastor because Pst Fatoyinbo that she painted would have cleverly avoided the prying gaze of the mother but the woman noticed the changes in her daughter. Remember, other daughters knew and belong to the flock too but Busola's attitude drew special attention from the Mummy but Busola allayed her Mummy's suspicion.
6. I agreed a lady can be raped without shouting but the kind of young lady Busola painted made the scene appeared like that of poorly directed Nollyhood movie. It was a big duplex but she avoided telling us the number of rooms in the building and that could have confirmed how big the building was. The case was not issue of shouting but no one could hear her but she never bothered. Then afterwards, she quickly wiped off the blood stain on the floor; she destroyed the evidence of the crime. This suggests that she was not only not resentful, she protected Pst Fatoyinbo from being found out. Remember, she didn't wipe it off on his instruction.
7. All through the interview, there were cases of people alleging her of affairs with Pst Fatoyinbo or pastors in the church and such rumours or allegations don't come if there was/were not closeness observed. This doesn't mean the alleged affairs were correct or not but suggests a reasonable level of closeness, to the extent of being alleged of church funds expended on you.
8. Busola avoided telling us where she wedded or if Pst Fatoyinbo played any role in the wedding. She avoided telling us the circumstances that led to her exit from the church eventually but she didn't claim it was because of the rape.
MY INFERENCE FROM BUSOLA'S VIDEO TESTIMONY:
1. Busola was more than 18yrs when Pst Fatoyinbo had canal knowledge of her, if at all.
2. If the rape occurred as alleged, Busola was already emotionally attached to the Pastor; it didn't lead to resentment and she still protected him.
3. From Busola's confession, it is logical to conclude it was a relationship gone bad because she hung around Pst Fatoyinbo unreasonably for too long.
4. She claimed Pst Fatoyinbo was instrumental to how her relationship with his Cousin didn't work out and that sounded like a dog guarding it's piece of bone from being snatched away; he was protective or jealous of seeing her in relationship with someone else.
MY CONCLUSION:
Though it's difficult to prove beyond reasonable doubts that rape occurred or consented sex for that matter, Busola Dakolo is not saying the whole truth and she has spoiled her own case. Making the recording in a Church was attempt to manipulate brethren and granting exclusive interview with a media station suggests financial consideration and those make the motive of the testimony suspicious.
Finally, Timi and Busola Dakolo don't appear as if they knew what they are getting into before coming forward with these allegations; they have been around the Pastor for so long for this untoward and poorly prepared allegations. The interviewer, Barrister Chude made matter worse because he was particular about sensational testimony than justice in this case; you have the sensation but where is justice?
Again, I am neither for not against either of them; I am not exonerating Pst Fatoyinbo of unholy affairs with Busola Dakolo but she only has a sensational testimony that proves nothing. In fact, it's more self indicting than alleging Pst Fatoyinbo in my opinion.
I pray God heals Busola Dakolo of any emotional wounds, if any. I pray God restores and uphold Pst Abiodun Fatoyinbo if truly he was complicit in rape or affairs with Busola or anyone for that matter.
What has happened notwithstanding, both of them are my brethren and this moment shall soon pass.

Rotimi Johnson Ojasope.

Sunday, 14 July 2019

A VOICE WELL DESERVED AT THE 9TH ASSEMBLY

A VOICE WELL DESERVED AT THE 9TH ASSEMBLY

By Peter Nebolisa.

Distinguished Senator kola Balogun of Oyo south senatorial district is a scholar and a Legislative member of the 9th Assembly.

Certain critical experience which he has gathered both within and outside the country has not only made his voice imperative at the chambers but has also Proffer quintessential contributions to the motions of his colleagues at the red chambers.

Last week 11th July 2019, he supported a motion sponsored by Senator Barau Jibrin of Kano North district, On Nigeria Membership Of The African Free Trade Area(AFCTA)

In one of his contributions, he pointed out three critical factors that will make Nigeria become competitive and takes a leap from being a dumping(consuming) nation; which are: Land, Labour and Capital.

He also stressed the need for government to invest in power and road infrastructure to enable the country move from a Consumer Nation to a Producing Nation, thereby creating wealth and providing enabling opportunities for the people.

No doubt Senator MKB representation to the people of Oyo south will present the zone with unique developmental opportunities within a short while.

 At a micro level, he has been recognized by his Unprecedented Opinions to most motions at the red chambers through the Senate President, Ahmed Ibrahim Lawan.

With this speed, I have a clear indication that he won't relent until he lay's down his promises to the good people of his Constituency that massively voted him in.

Senator kola Balogun  Leadership actions are best practically oriented and has shown certain critical experience to deliver.

#iStandWithMKB

Senator Kola Balogun condemns KomKom's Pipeline Explosion

Press release
14 July, 2019
Ibadan.

Senator Representing Oyo South Senatorial District at the Upper legislative Chamber, Dr Kola Balogun has condemned the Pipeline explosion that occurs at Kom Kom town, Oyingbo Local Government Area, Rivers State at the early morning of June 22, 2019.
He made this submission on Wednesday, July 3, 2019  at the Senate floor while supporting the motion sponsored by Senator
Sekibo George T representing Rivers East and co-sponsored by Senator Mpigi Barinada representing Rivers South-East, Senator James E. Manager (Delta South) and
Sen. Apiafi Betty J. Okagua (Rivers West).

He submits that, irrespective of the State where the pipelines explosion occurred, so long as life was lost, such should be of National discuss at the Senate.

According to the previous  week update obtained from his District Office through the Special Adviser-2 on Public Communication, Mr Busayo Olawoyin,
Dr Kola Balogun reveals that, most of the explosions that occur in Nigeria  according to recent study are due to  the high level of corruption and sabotage in the agencies charge to maintain it.

He further stresses that more attention need to be given to Agencies involved considering the fact that any thing that happens to them will have a negative effect on our economy as regards unemployment rates.

He therefore urged the Government to deplore necessary modern equipments that can quickly detect any fault that may arise from our pipelines just like it is been done in a developed countries.

Signed.
Olawoyin Edris Busayo
SA-2, Public Communication

ELDER OYELESE: RENEWED HOPE MUST BEGIN AT THE GRASSROOTS, FULL EXECUTION OF LG AUTONOMY CRUCIAL.

ELDER WOLE OYELESE CALLS FOR FULL EXECUTION OF SUPREME COURT JUDGMENT ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT AUTONOMY. Says Renewed Hope Must Begin at the Gras...